Confirming the rule that armies always prepare to fight the previous war, the idea of tanks fighting tanks was an anathema to the U.S. Army of the 1930s, just as it had been to the combatants of the First World War, who used tanks supported by infantry to
assault positions held by infantry, not to fight other tanks. Defense against massed enemy armor was just that – defense. Aggressive anti-tank tactics was a doctrine forced on the American army by the Wehrmacht's romp across Poland in September 1939. The German’s success forced the Americans to build from scratch an anti-tank capacity, which culminated in the formation of the Tank Destroyer Forces.
After being tested in the Fall 1941 maneuvers, the anti-tank concept won a certain independence from the infantry and field artillery. This independence was limited due to a continuous and rancorous debate of the doctrine and use of AT forces. While there was agreement on the necessity of such formations, the head of each of the existing combat arms, except Armor, wanted responsibility for these new units.
In early December 1941, putting an aggressive spin on the "anti-tank" function, the battalions were renamed Tank Destroyer, and a Tank Destroyer Tactical and Firing Center was activated at Ft. Meade, Maryland. The Center was moved shortly thereafter to Camp Hood, Texas, where it was enlarged in March 1942 to form the Tank Destroyer Command, whose mission was to coordinate the creation and training of the new units.
The aggressive spin that attached to the title "Tank Destroyer" was based on the mobility, speed, and tactics these units possessed in theory. Often, however, the practical function of motorized TD units was reconnaissance, a function inconsistent with two-thirds of their "Seek, Strike, Destroy" motto. Initially, lack of adequate firepower posed an unwarranted liability to the success of these units’ primary mission of combating enemy armor, and the Army's Ordnance Department never ceased its efforts to improve the armament of Tank Destroyer forces.
There were many high-level discussions of "light" and "medium" versions of tank destroyer vehicles and weapons. With their low velocities and small calibers, both the 37-mm and 57-mm rounds were totally inadequate against enemy armor; German armor, in particular, which was specially designed to resist larger-caliber penetrating rounds. Ordnance test results were embarrassing: the tiny 37-mm shells were unable to pierce relatively thin wood even at a range of less than 100 yards, yet 37-mm guns were ordered in large quantities, probably to appease influential congressmen. The 37-mm and 57-mm guns had limited success against Japanese armor. Incredibly, the 37-mm guns were installed in the rear decks of M-6 trucks ("Fargos"), which were little more than stretch Jeeps. North Africa proved how vulnerable and unsuccessful these armed M-6 trucks were. Ordnance even experimented with a 37-mm half-track jeep, but that combination never left the proving grounds. Towed-gun battalions were subsequently armed with 76-mm cannons.
Ultimately, a French 75-mm gun was installed in a half-track. The 75-mm gun was woefully outclassed by the infamous German 88-mm gun, which featured a 28" to 30" high-velocity round. The thinly-armored half-tracks were not as fast as German armor, and they presented very high silhouettes as targets. Additionally, the half-track had to face the target during firing: its gun could not traverse.
Gen. Lucian Truscott, who rose from command of the 5th Cavalry Regiment to command of the 5th Army during the war years, used the Kasserine Pass debacle to underscore the inadequacy of the TD units’ firepower:
"My Tunisian experience also provided me with an outstanding example of how American soldiers can be indoctrinated in training. Our tank destroyer battalions, organized only a few months previous, with no historical prototype, equipped with an improvised weapon – an almost unarmored half-track mounting an entirely inadequate 75-mm gun – had been taught during their training that it was their duty to seek out and destroy enemy tanks. The number of half-tracks which these gallant units left on the Tunisian deserts was mute testimony to the superiority of German armor, and antitank guns. It was also evidence of the efficacy of their indoctrination, a mark that I was to note among these units throughout the war."

Read the rest of this entry »
"After Kerscher had closed on me, he radioed and pointed to the right. A "Stalin" tank was broadside to us next to a barn. It was a vehicle we hadn't yet seen in the Northern Sector of the front.
We were startled for a moment, because the tank was outfitted with an extremely long 122-mm cannon.
This was the first Russian tank cannon with a muzzle brake.

Moreover, the "Stalin" tank looked somewhat similar in it's shape to our "King Tiger." After I initially hesitated, just as Kerscher did, it occured to me immediately that only the running gear was typically Russian. I fired and the tank burst into flames. After this short disgression, we finished off all of Ivan's vehicles in the village, just as we had arranged earlier.
Kerscher and I later had to laugh because we had thought for a moment that we had had a "King Tiger" in front of us that had been captured by the Russians. In the heat of battle, however, such things could sometimes come to pass."
- Otto Carius: Tigers in the Mud.
The IS-2 tank first saw combat in the spring of 1944 and were assigned to separate heavy tank regiments, normally of 21 tanks each. These regiments were used to reinforce the most important attack sectors during major offensive operations. Tactically, they were employed as breakthrough tanks. Their role was to support infantry in the assault, using their large guns to destroy bunkers, buildings, dug-in crew-served weapons, and other 'soft' targets. They were also capable of taking on any German AFV if the need arose. Once a breakthrough was achieved, lighter, more mobile T-34s would take over the exploitation. The IS-2 weighed about the same as a German Panther, and was lighter than the German heavy tanks, the Tiger series. It was slightly lower than both. A major weakness was the two-part ammunition, which slowed the rate of fire considerably. A second weakness was the very limited ammunition supply of only 28 rounds. This was the price paid by the small size of the design. One of the IS-2's most notable engagements took place during the fighting in August 1944 to establish a bridgehead over the river Vistula around the town of Sandomierz.. This was the first time the IS-2 had come up against the fearsome Tiger II. During the engagement on August 13, the 71st Independent Heavy Tank Regiment's eleven IS-2s blocked an attack by fourteen Tiger IIs of the 105th Heavy Panzer Regiment. An engagement at about 700 meters (770 yd) coupled with skilled tactical handling saw four Tiger IIs destroyed for the loss of three IS-2s and seven damaged.

Read the rest of this entry »

In 1776, Jean Baptiste de Gribeauval was assigned to the position of general of artillery in the French Army. In this capacity, he trained younger officers, including Napoleon Bonapart and was able to implement his artillery reforms on a broad scale. He increased the wages given to soldiers and improved the living quarters of lower-ranking men. In addition, Gribeauval was able to standardize the caliber of cannons and increase their mobility by reducing tube lengths and weights. He also introduced the howitzer, which was commonly used by other armies of the time.
Gribeauval designed waterproff ammunition wagons that were lighter than their predecessors. He developed specialized training for officers that incorporated aspects of career management. Gribeauval’s reforms made the French army a leader in the use of artillery. It remained a superior European fighting force into the nineteenth century.
Gribeauval’s artillery reforms indirectly affected the fledgling American army. Gribeauval’s proteges; several officers who had been trained by Gribeauval, later served in the fledgling American army. One of the most influential of Gribeauval’s proteges was Louis de Toussard. Many of Gribeauval’s artillery reforms were adopted by the American military, and remained in effect until after the Civil War. They continued to play a role and influence the U.S. military through World War One.

Masterpiece Models - http://www.masterpiecemodels.com - asked me to produce a pair of Gribeauval Cannons to be included as a part of a larger exhibit that Masterpiece Models has been commissioned to construct. I was asked to depict the cannons as they were used by the United States Marine Corps during the War of 1812.
Read the rest of this entry »

The Caterpillar D7 series medium bulldozer began service with the U.S. military during World War II. With upgrades and changes, it has been a workhorse for the U.S. Military for over fifty years, fulfilling its primary earthmoving role as well as a host of other roles discovered for it, for example mine clearing with a special flail adapter kit.

The idea for this project is based upon a photograph showing a D7 Dozer clearing the wreckage of a Panzer IV from the roadway.
Read the rest of this entry »
"Fuhrer is convinced that immediately after the delivery of Sturmpanzers to the units there will be great need for this type of vehicles." – Albert Speer.
During a conference on October 2, 1942, Speer presented the plans of a new Sturmpanzer and on October 14, 1942, designs were shown to Adolf Hitler. Based on these designs, Hitler ordered production of 40 to 60 new vehicles that should be ready by spring 1943. The new Sturmpanzer was to use the Panzer IV chassis and the 150mm StuH 43 L/12 gun (developed into a tank mounted weapon from the sIG 33 by Skoda). At the same time, Hitler also requested that the new design be mounted with a 210mm or 220mm mortar, but this never happened. In February 1943, Skoda produced a wooden prototype of the new Sturmpanzer IV (Sturmpanzer 43). The vehicle was designated Sd.Kfz.166, Sturmgeschütz IV mit 15cm StuH 43.
"We always were considered a ‘fire brigade’ unit, and always were used when the infantry was in trouble and lots of artillery had to be brought down at the enemy and fast. More than one infantry regiment blessed us after we had smashed a heavy attack of the enemy…Funny thing, though. As happy as the commanders of the supported units were when we smashed an enemy attack, the ‘Landsers’, the line infantry, were glad when we left, because enemy artillery fire was pounding them to hell while we were there. They could not change the locations of their fox holes, but we could move back and forth and sideways to escape enemy artillery at least to some extent" – Joseph Scharrer, 3rd Company of Sturmpanzerabteilung 216, from May of 1943 to October of 1944.
Read the rest of this entry »
This is one of those "afternoon" projects, well, at least the construction portion. The Allied Groupbuild hosted by Lu Rodriguez on ML is the push I needed to pull this little gem off of my shelf. I am using the MIG Productions 1/48 Dodge WC, and speaking of Lu, a big "hats off" on his wonderful rendition of the vehicle as shown on the box art.
Lu’s work, however, posed a bit of a problem for me. Although I wanted to do this vehicle I didn’t want to replicate, nor have my work compared to his fine example…yep, I’m chicken. So, while busy trying to avoid replicating Lu’s work I hit upon the idea of asking for his help. I’m lazy, afterall, and if he had done research for the box art then perhaps he would have some inspiration references he would be willing to share. Lu, who is also an admitted "lazy" modeler had a nice chuckle
and then produced a beatuiful reference vehicle from his collection. The vehicle is shown in a sand finish sporting twin .50 caliber weapons mounted in the rear bed. As an added touch a field modified fuel can rack is mounted to the rear. Perfect.
Read the rest of this entry »
After the British Expeditionary Force had been evacuated at Dunkirk, having lost most of their equipment in the process, the British Army was in dire need of replacements. This was especially so for Tanks, of which there were only about 100 in the British Isles at that time. To accommodate this, the British government pushed forward a tank design that predated the onset of the Second World War, the A20.
Th A20 was designed to meet the expected needs of First World War style trench warfare, where the main emphasis of the tank was to navigate shell cratered ground and demolish infantry obstacles such as barbed wire and was influenced that for the French Char B tank. Between then the Woolwich Arsenal and Harland & Wolff developed the A20 from a specification in 1939 to working prototype form by June 1940. Once had been complete Vauxhall (the car manufacturers) took over the project, designing and building a prototype, which was designed the A22 by November 1940. The later version of tank had evolved based on the battles in Poland and France. However it still kept many of the same features that would put it a disadvantage confronted with the rapid nature of blitzkrieg tactics but were also prove to be some of its strengths. The first production units were available by the middle 1941.
The hull was made up of simple flat plates initially bolted but later welded together. The suspension was fitted under the two large "panniers" either side of the hull – the track running over the top. There were 11 bogies either side, each carrying two 10-inch wheels. Only 9 of the bogies were taking the vehicle weight normally, with the front ones only coming into play when the vehicle nosed into the ground or against an obstacle.
The rear ones acted in part as track tensioners. The twin engines were connected through a common crankshaft feeding a regenerative transmission steered by a tiller bar rather than levers or steering wheel. The interior was comparatively roomy and the large hatches in the sides made escape easy. They were also to be one of the reasons for its later conversion into the AVRE. The first turrets were cast with a rounded shape – sufficient for the relatively small 2-pdr gun, but when a larger gun (6-pdr) was required the turrets became larger with welded construction. To fulfil its role as an infantry support vehicle the first models were equipped with a 3 inch howitzer in the hull and although this could deliver a useful HE round complementing the weakness of the 2-pdr in that area it was limited by a poor fire arc, due to the way the tracks extended in front of the hull.
Read the rest of this entry »
Somalia has been embroiled in conflict since 1991. Warlords associated with General Mohamed Farrah Aidid overthrew the government sending the country into civil war. In 1993 US Special Forces collaborated with a UN intervention team to capture General Aidid, characterized in the movie and book Black Hawk Down.
Since then, Somalia has had as many as thirteen governments attempting to rule the region with little success. In 2006, the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC),
a militia the US alleges is an al Qaida affiliate, were ousted from power after 6-months of Taliban-style rule. The UIC has sworn to launch an Iraqi inspired insurgency against the government. The current government was brought to power after US trained Ethiopian forces working with US Special Forces raided the capital. The current government declared victory around the end of April and the capital city has been in relative calm since then.
As almost taken from a scene from a Mad Max movie, militias across the world have converted civilian vehicles into all manner of armed war wagons. The technical is usually a four wheel truck or a formidable heavy vehicle equipped with a machine gun or another type of unforgiving weapon. The name originated when Red Cross members in Somali were forced to pay local militias or they would be attacked or robbed, these were "technical" expenses. The concept of the technical has been around for a long time, an adequate craft with a gun. It was in Mogadishu, Somalia
that it gained widespread use. It was the militia’s vehicle of choice. It was the perfect weapon for the Militia Forces since they could not afford tanks and other more famous weapons of war. Technicals were quick, light, and cheap. Any truck could be turned into one with the right gun. Any truck could be turned into one with the right gun. In the Battle of Mogadishu many technical’s were stationed at roadblocks and acted as turrets against the U.S. Forces. It was usually painted to tell it was a war vehicle. It served useful as a carrier because of the bed space in the back of trucks. These armed, light duty trucks were perfect in traveling long distances and harsh conditions since they were trucks already meant for going off road.
Read the rest of this entry »
One of the enjoyable aspects of modeling is that I get to also get to be a bit of a researcher and historian. Although the projects below were commissioned and built independant from one another, though my research I was able to find a common theme which would tie them together; the conflict in Aden. On this page are presented 3 different vehicles each of which served with the British forces in and around Aden.
The Aden Emergency was an insurgency against British crown forces in what is now the country of Yemen. The conflict lasted from 10 December 1963 when a "State of Emergency" was declared until 30 November 1967 when British forces left. The emergency began when members of the National Liberation Front (NLF) carried out a grenade attack against the British High Commission. This attack killed one person, injured fifty, and caused the British Government to declare a "state of emergency".
In January 1964, the British moved into the Radfan hills in the border region to confront Egyptian-backed guerrillas, later reinforced by the NLF. This operation was code-named "Nutcracker." In April, a second operation called "Cap Badge" had the overall political objective of reasserting Federal Authority and making the Dhala Road safe for traffic. By October the insurgents had largely been suppressed, and the NLF switched to grenade attacks against off-duty military personnel and police officers elsewhere in the Aden Colony.
When the British left Aden in November 1967, the area rapidly fell under the control of the Marxist-oriented Front for the Liberation of South Yemen, which founded the People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen (PDRY).
Aden and the Federation of South Arabia were left under control of the NLF. Aden became the capital of the new People’s Republic of South Yemen. This was renamed in 1970 to become the People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen.
Read the rest of this entry »
The Staghound began as a 1941 US concept for a medium to heavy armored car, and was the 4 x 4 GM (Chevrolet) contender as the T17E1 versus a 6 x 6 vehicle dubbed the T17 from Ford. The T17E1 was determined to be the winner, but as it weighed nearly 14 tons (or more than the M3 light tank) it was considered as a "wheeled tank" by the Ordnance Board in November 1942.
The British, thus far unable to come up with a suitable heavy armored car design, liked what they saw and while under test order 2000 of them in February 1942. Overall, the British order ran to 2,687 Staghound armored cars and 789 Staghound AA vehicles (T17E2) with an open turret and twin M2HB .50 caliber machine guns. These were delivered between October 1942 and December 1943.
The British developed four versions of the Staghound on the Chevrolet chassis: the Staghound I, armed with a 37mm gun in a three-man turret; the Staghound II, which replaced the 37mm gun with a British 3" howitzer; an American variant dubbed the T17E3 which was not further developed, which replaced the enclosed turret with the open turret from the M8 HMC with its 75mm howitzer; and the Staghound III, which swapped the 37mm turret for the complete turret from a Crusader Mk. III tank fitted with a 75mm gun.
Read the rest of this entry »